Employee Efficiency and Organization Productivity †Free Samples

Question: Discuss about the Employee Efficiency and Organization Productivity. Answer: Introduction: This paper reviews the article The Effect of the Motivation Techniques Used by Managers to Increase the Productivity of their Workers and an Application by Guclu and Guney (2017). The thesis statement of this article is that productivity of employees can be increased by motivating them. The aim of this article is to determine the managers perceptions towards their employees specifically in manufacturing facilities. The intended audience of this article are managers who manage several employees and need to analyze factors that affect employee productivity. The study is also beneficial for the scholars and practitioners who are looking to research motivation as an impactful way to increase employee motivation and productivity. These researchers shall be able to critically analyze factors affecting efficiency and conduct further studies to enhance organizational productivity. The authors Haci Guclu and Salih Guney are professors in Istanbul Aydin University which is one of the most repu ted educational institutions. Therefore, the source of this study may be considered reliable. The title of the study clearly indicates that the study is related to motivation techniques for employee productivity. However, the title fails to mention that the study is linked with employees of manufacturing employees that may be indicative of research being a general study. The abstract of this article is elaborate and detailed where a brief is provided of efficiency and motivation techniques. Although, it is observed that the concept of efficiency and motivation could be provided in introduction rather than the abstract. Additionally, the findings and recommendations of the test conducted are not provided that makes it unclear for the audience. A complete picture of the study is not obtained through the abstract. Further, the problem of the research study is not clearly stated. The purpose of this study is stated while it forgets to specify the problems that may arise if the employees are not motivated. Guclu and Guney (2017) could have stated the aims, objectives, research que stions or hypotheses clearly. As the study does not state any research questions or hypotheses, the specific issue or concern that shall be addressed in the research study is unclear (Graves, Sarkis and Zhu 2013). The literature of the research study involves the importance and nature of motivation and efficiency in the workplace. The literature of this study is strong as Guclu and Guney (2017) involves different theories related to motivation such as Maslow's Theory of Need Hierarchy, Alderfer's Erg Theory, Herzbergs Two-Factor Theory, McClellands Need Theory, Vrooms Expectancy Theory and various others. These theories are considered the most popular and most applied in every organization. However, every theory could be diagrammatically represented that would help in better understanding of the audience. Additionally, a conceptual framework could be added where motivation and efficiency can be represented in the form of figure. It would help in better understanding of the study including theories, beliefs and factors which are a part of research design (Gupta and Shaw 2014). The study conducted by Chen et al. (2015) links perceived health support and employee productivity. This research article needs to establish the importance of monetary and non-monetary factors affecting motivation level of the employees. It is argued that provision of job incentives can contribute to social and physical factors thereby influencing employee motivation (Patro 2015). It is argued that motivation has a strong influence over staff outcomes and job satisfaction. The theories need to be determined for job satisfaction and employee commitment levels. Recommendations such as conducting training sessions, hiking salary, providing bonuses and recognizing employees in the organization can be provided (Kumar and Babu 2015). The research methodology adopted by Guclu and Guney (2017) to conduct the research study is survey. As the population was too big, 229 people were selected as the sample size working in erkezky Organized Industrial Site. The design is appropriate for the study as quantitative analysis is suitable for conducting research study in a large population. The sample size is sufficient for the purpose of study, i.e. motivation affecting efficiency of the employees. The data findings of this study is clearly represented in the form of tables that helps differentiate the responses gathered from people of different age groups, educational background and other demographics. Guclu and Guney (2017) specifies the data collection and analysis methods that are the strongest parts of the research article. The results of the article are stated using different methods of analysis such as Cronbachs alpha and Kruskal-Wallis Test. Cronbachs alpha is a test used for measuring internal consistency. It is con sidered to be a measure of scale reliability. Kruskal-Wallis test helps in measuring validity and reliability of the research study. Therefore, the test results of this research study are reliable and valid as significant tests are conducted. The analysis for the research study is in alignment with motivation level and efficiency of the employees. A clear link between motivation and employee productivity is established. The results could also be represented in the form of graphs or charts apart from tables to enhance pictorial representation which is more impactful in understanding (Barrick et al. 2015). The research study lacks a critical discussion and no relationship to the theories and concepts to previous literature have been determined. A good research article comprises of a critical discussion that discusses the findings of research study and assumptions or concepts formulated for the research study. Guclu and Guney (2017) could make the research better by evaluating the text. The findings of the study that were different from that of concepts and assumptions from previous literature go unidentified. According to Samnani and Singh (2014), recognition is a motivating non-monetary factor. The importance of employees as most valuable assets needs to be determined. This question cannot be answered with a definite statement. Against the background of the research study, this article must explore through the ways that enhances employee motivation or willingness to work. The study can be expanded by motivation affecting their commitment level towards the organization that can increas e productivity. A discussion regarding employee loyalty and commitment towards the organization can also be linked with employee productivity (Mikkelson, York, and Arritola 2015). The final section of this report, Conclusion and Suggestions adds to the summary of the entire research study and recommendations for conducting any further study. The summary of research is presented in an excellent manner. The findings from the literature and primary research is well represented and linked back with the references that adds weight to the arguments made in the study (Hogan and Coote 2014). However, one of the greatest weaknesses of the article is that it does not include the implications of the study. The intended audience through this research study are not determined that might mislead the readers. The research study only involves primary method of research that made the study time-consuming. Guclu and Guney (2017) might have chosen to involve secondary study analysis as well to obtain time-saving and cost benefits. The peer-reviewed journal articles are reliable sources for adding to the research study (Cerasoli, Nicklin and Ford 2014). The suggestions provided f or conducting further research gives a hint to conduct future study. As the study is limited to a single organization, it cannot be used to generalize results. The employees of erkezky Organized Industrial Site are assessed due to which the result for other industries cannot be assumed. It is further noted that the references chosen for this research study are not the best ones. Incomplete references are provided for academic books that do not mention the edition or place of publication. The research study could involve more peer-reviewed articles and other reputed journals that make the research study authentic. Also, the references are decades old that make the data questionable. There might be a chance that the data might not be appropriate for analyzing the employees of current situation as the data sources are outdated. Also, no appendix is provided stating the survey that was conducted to gather data for this research study. There is a need for survey comprising of questions that were asked to the participants of this research study (Boxall, Hutchison and Wassenaar 2015). Conclusively, the thesis statement of this research study is proven significant. The employee motivation and productivity are highly linked with one another. The increase in motivation shall increase the productivity level of employees. It is argued that provision of job incentives can contribute to social and physical factors thereby influencing employee motivation. The tests involved in this research study- Cronbachs alpha and Kruskal-Wallis Test are highly reliable and valid. The study can be expanded by motivation affecting their commitment level towards the organization that can increase productivity. There might be a chance that the data might not be appropriate for analyzing the employees of current situation as the data sources are outdated. There is a need for survey comprising of questions that were asked to the participants of this research study. The study can be expanded by motivation affecting their commitment level towards the organization that can increase productivit y. References Barrick, M.R., Thurgood, G.R., Smith, T.A. and Courtright, S.H., 2015. Collective organizational engagement: Linking motivational antecedents, strategic implementation, and firm performance.Academy of Management Journal,58(1), pp.111-135. Boxall, P., Hutchison, A. and Wassenaar, B., 2015. How do high-involvement work processes influence employee outcomes? An examination of the mediating roles of skill utilisation and intrinsic motivation.The International Journal of Human Resource Management,26(13), pp.1737-1752. Cerasoli, C.P., Nicklin, J.M. and Ford, M.T., 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis.Psychological bulletin,140(4), p.980. Chen, L., Hannon, P.A., Laing, S.S., Kohn, M.J., Clark, K., Pritchard, S. and Harris, J.R., 2015. Perceived workplace health support is associated with employee productivity. American Journal of Health Promotion, 29(3), pp.139-146. Graves, L.M., Sarkis, J. and Zhu, Q., 2013. How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China.Journal of Environmental Psychology,35, pp.81-91. Guclu, H. and Guney, S., 2017. The Effect of the Motivation Techniques Used by Managers to Increase the Productivity of their Workers and an Application. Business Management Dynamics, 6(7), p.01-18. Gupta, N. and Shaw, J.D., 2014. Employee compensation: The neglected area of HRM research.Human Resource Management Review,24(1), pp.1-4. Hogan, S.J. and Coote, L.V., 2014. Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein's model.Journal of Business Research,67(8), pp.1609-1621. Kumar, K.P. and Babu, S.S., 2015. Social engagement synergy of unionized employees with enterprise objectives: An emerging paradigm in industrial relations.IUP Journal of Management Research,14(2), p.52. Mikkelson, A.C., York, J.A. and Arritola, J., 2015. Communication competence, leadership behaviors, and employee outcomes in supervisor-employee relationships.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,78(3), pp.336-354. Patro, C.S., 2015. Influence of Retention Policies on Employee Efficiency and Organization Productivity.Managerial Strategies and Practice in the Asian Business Sector, p.124. Samnani, A.K. and Singh, P., 2014. Performance-enhancing compensation practices and employee productivity: The role of workplace bullying.Human Resource Management Review,24(1), pp.5-16.